Skip to content

T913: cid + not discrete => uncountable pi-character#1813

Merged
prabau merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cid-pichar
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

T913: cid + not discrete => uncountable pi-character#1813
prabau merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cid-pichar

Conversation

@prabau

@prabau prabau commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

New T913: cid + ~ discrete => ~ countable pi-character

This allows to derive that 8 more spaces have uncountable pi-character:
π-Base, Search for cid + ~ discrete + ? Has countable $\pi$-character

@prabau prabau added the theorem label Jul 2, 2026
@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
image ouch

Comment thread theorems/T000913.md Outdated
and let $\mathscr V$ be a countable collection of nonempty open sets.
To show $X$ has uncountable $\pi$-character, we show that $\mathscr V$ is not a local $\pi$-base for $x$.
Each $V\in\mathscr V$ contains a point $x_V\ne x$.
The set $F:=\{x_V:V\in\mathscr V\}$ is countable, hence closed since $X$ is {P168}.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For this to make sense you have to click on P168. When I read it I was breifly confused.
Maybe you can write "(see [the stackexchange post we use in P168)", to make this clearer?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Equivalent conditions for P168:

  • every countable set is closed.
  • every countable set is discrete.

When P168 was first introduced, it was called countable sets are closed, as it seemed useful but we did not know it had appeared in the literature. Later on, we learned that it was equivalent to countable sets are discrete, sometimes called "cid" in the literature. So we changed the main name to that discrete version.

The problem is that previous proof justifications from before the name change became hard to understand because {P168} now expands to something seemingly unrelated. These proofs should be updated. e.g. https://topology.pi-base.org/theorems/T000417.

For this PR I prefer not to refer to the mathse post here, but I'll rephrase things.

@prabau

prabau commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author
image

(This comes from the list of Theorems.)
I agree these breaks between the logical negation symbol and the property names are awkward.

@StevenClontz is that something that could be fixed in pi-data/web?

@yhx-12243

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
image (This comes from the list of Theorems.) I agree these breaks between the logical negation symbol and the property names are awkward.

@StevenClontz is that something that could be fixed in pi-data/web?

In fact this appears earlier lot of times, e.g., T88.

@prabau

prabau commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Thanks @yhx-12243. I think if something could be done to improve the layout of the expanded text, that would be good. Low priority of course.

Let's see what @StevenClontz thinks.

@prabau prabau merged commit cae1026 into main Jul 3, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau prabau deleted the cid-pichar branch July 3, 2026 04:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants